Trust & Methodology

Built on official public data, with the provenance to prove it.

Akil supports research and diligence by making source attribution, interpretation, coverage, freshness, and caveats visible in public-record workflows.

Method

What Akil tries to preserve.

Source attribution

Outputs should name the official source, preserve the source record where possible, and provide a verification path back to the public record.

Coverage disclosure

Akil distinguishes applied search windows, Akil mirror coverage, source freshness, result caps, and public-source universe when known.

Semantic interpretation

Code values, statuses, counts, rates, license rows, public-money records, and identity roles are explained without turning them into claims they do not support.

Trust Contracts

Public-record answers need boundaries.

01

Coverage contract

Search results are returned slices, not blanket clearance. Akil should show what was searched and what may exist outside the response or mirror.

02

Identity contract

Name-only matches are candidates. People, organizations, vendors, applicants, licensees, committees, lobbyists, addresses, BBLs, and source IDs remain separate until anchored.

03

Metric contract

Counts, rates, estimates, report years, geographies, reporting bias, point-in-time census values, and capped pages should not be treated as total universe measurements.

04

Regulatory contract

License, certification, permit, procurement, payment, and authority records are source-registry signals, not full operating, legal, environmental, or compliance clearance.

Trust Checks

Trust checks make the methodology repeatable.

Akil's trust checks are not UI tests and they are not marketing claims. They are repeatable checks for whether public-record answers keep source meaning, uncertainty, and limits visible.

Source and caveat checks

The suite checks high-risk interpretation traps across coverage, identity, metrics, regulatory records, source attribution, and empty-result language.

Sources visible

Coverage and no-result checks

These checks look for source footers, caveats, broad-query guards, degraded paths, and ACRIS broad-party protection on the live MCP surface.

Limits visible

Identity and regulatory checks

Known tricky records are checked so name matches, license rows, public-money records, and no-row results stay bounded.

Roles separated

Current evidence: public trust status summarizes the technical checks behind coverage disclosure, identity discipline, regulatory boundaries, source footers, degraded-path handling, and ACRIS broad-party protection.

Live Status

Public trust status lives next to the MCP Worker.

The current public trust-status endpoint summarizes the latest bundled trust-check evidence for Akil's MCP layer. It is a snapshot, not a real-time database monitor.

Trust is part of the product.

The goal is not to make public records sound cleaner than they are. The goal is to make their meaning, limits, and verification paths usable.